- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 07:02:49 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- cc: <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, <devon@taller.pscl.cwru.edu>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> > <abc:property>
> > <rdf:value>foo</rdf:value>
> > <rdf:type rdf:resource="xyz:string"/>
> > </abc:property>
>
> Sorry, that should have been
>
> <abc:property>
> <rdf:Description>
> <rdf:value>foo</rdf:value>
> <rdf:type rdf:resource="xyz:string"/>
^^^^^^^^^
> </rdf:Description>
> </abc:property>
>
> Patrick
We're simply not in a position to change the spec to allow namespace
qualified names in attribute values. That would fit better in a WG
chartered to improve the RDF syntax, rather than bugfix it. So if
'xyz:string' is supposed to be using XML namespaces, no can do.
But don't let this put you off! Proposals for new, better, faster sleeker
RDF XML syntaxes are always welcome.
Dan
--
mailto:danbri@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/People/DanBri/
Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 07:02:56 UTC