W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > October 2001

Re: RDFCore Update

From: Thomas B. Passin <tpassin@home.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 23:52:44 -0400
Message-ID: <00b001c15851$82fa1fb0$7cac1218@cj64132b>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
[Peter F. Patel-Schneider]

> I don't know how you could handle a prescriptive meaning for rdfs:range in
> an open environment.  You certainly can't say that the target object has
> belong to the range when the triple is read because there is no notion of
> order in RDF.

But that only means that you cannot validate the graph until the whole thing
is constructed.  That's no different that for XML Schema itself.  Why do you
think that would be unworkable?  It would let you separate graph
construction and validation into separate processing layers, which should be
good not bad.


Tom P
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 23:47:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:32 UTC