- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 21:17:01 +0200
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi Brian, Brian McBride wrote: > One major area of focus for the WG at the moment is datatyping, e.g. using XML > schema datatypes in RDF. Now would be a good time to let us have your thoughts > and ideas on this. > > Brian I am currently diving deep into W3C XML Schema datatypes and, without wanting to sound negative, I find them far from perfect... This list is probably not the place to discuss pros and cons of W3C XML Schema datatypes, but I think that the mechanism which will be defined to bind the datatypes should be generic and extensible enough to allow to bind other datatype systems (should any become available)! I am not sure how relevant this is for RDF, but RELAX NG has also had to solve the issue of "pluging" optional datatype systems into an "untyped" model and this has been solved by attaching datatype libraries and type information identified by a URI (for the library) and a NCName (for the datatype in this library): http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/spec-20010917.html#data-pattern My 0,02 Euros. Eric -- Rendez-vous à Paris pour le Forum XML. http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 15:16:46 UTC