- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 00:40:12 -0700
- To: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Ah; sweet. I had thought I read somewhere that they weren't; this makes things much easier (as long as it can be represented in attributes only). Thanks. Any other feedback appreciated; I'm going to start playing more with the form below. Cheers, On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:31:27AM -0700, Jason Diamond wrote: > > <element name="stock" type="nonNegativeInteger" > > extract:subject="parent::widget" > > extract:object="self::text()" > > /> > > > Unfortunately, I'm led to believe that such adornment is illegal in > > Schema. > > Actually, this is allowed in XML Schemas. See [1] where it says > that all elements in an XML Schema document are allowed to have > attributes qualified with namespaces other than the XML Schema > namespace. > > Jason. > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#section-XML-Representations-of-Components > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2001 03:40:14 UTC