- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 16:12:07 +0100
- To: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@jfinity.com>
- cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
>>>Gabe Beged-Dov said: > small nit. the XML ID type is specifically not used in the BNF since > the ID can appear multiple times in an RDF/XML document. So even if > the _<n> approach had not been used (thus allowing use of DTD), the > DTD wouldn't have been able to do ID validation. One of many nits. I had a working assumption we could add words so that an RDF ID would be defined as an XML ID which isn't clear since RDF doesn't use words, a DTD or even XML Schema to define the syntax terms. I'm just trying to fix bigger nits! Some RDF/XML parsers check the IDs as XML IDs (no duplicates allowed, restrictions on allowed chars in the ID) and some don't. Dave
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2001 11:12:20 UTC