- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 06:38:01 -0400
- To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>, "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Brian McBride wrote: > I believe this is legal. A property can have a nested Description or typed > node element as its value - see first option of production 6.12 and > production 6.17 of the grammar in section 6 of M&S. Duh! My mistake, my brain saw the "description" production and not the fact that a typedNode is an option, also a couple of the parsers had trouble doing this correctly though SiRPAC (as I recall) works fine. -Jonathan
Received on Monday, 7 May 2001 06:38:47 UTC