RE: QName Problem Isn't One

Brian McBride wrote:

> I believe this is legal.  A property can have a nested Description or
> node element as its value - see first option of production 6.12 and
> production 6.17 of the grammar in section 6 of M&S.

Duh! My mistake, my brain saw the "description" production and not the fact
that a typedNode is an option, also a couple of the parsers had trouble
doing this correctly though SiRPAC (as I recall) works fine.


Received on Monday, 7 May 2001 06:38:47 UTC