- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 10:55:52 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <cg@cs.uah.edu>
From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> > > > I don't have any problem with any reasonable syntax for quantification. > > > The problem is, as usual, in providing a meaning for the syntactic > > > constructs. How are you proposing to do that? > > > > By also representing the behavior of the system in the same "syntactic > > constructs". > > And how are you going to ground this? There is no connection between > syntax and behavior unless you have some active component in the formalism, > and there is no such component in RDF or RDFS. Every computer has "active components"; they are called programs. Any program can be given a URI; therefore it can be referred to from the "syntactic formalism" of an RDF graph. We should be able to easily design a schema in RDF to point to object oriented programs that would implement any known behavior such as the computing of inferred statements. Seth
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2001 14:01:55 UTC