- From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 23:26:35 +0600
- To: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Look what you've done now Seth, even TimBL's at it : http://www.w3.org/2001/04/roadmap/ --- Danny Ayers http://www.isacat.net <- -----Original Message----- <- From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org <- [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Seth Russell <- Sent: 03 May 2001 22:35 <- To: Jan Grant <- Cc: Danny Ayers; Www-Rdf-Logic; RDF-Interest <- Subject: Re: relational mapping? <- <- <- From: "Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk> <- <- > > No doubt you are aware of the list of these recorded at [1], to which <- list I <- > > have added the structure diagrammed at [2]. <- > > <- > > [1] http://www-db.stanford.edu/~melnik/rdf/db.html <- > > [2] http://robustai.net/mentography/SemStructure.gif <- > <- > Neat; but these seem to be "storing RDF in RDBMS" as opposed to <- > "producing RDF from a (legacy?) RDBMS" <- <- Ok sorry, I see now you want to go the other direction. I saw somewhere <- (forget where) the idea that you could do it this way: <- <- A RDF Class represents a Relational Table. <- A RDF instance node represents a Relational Record. <- The columns in the Relational table are the property arcs on the instance <- nodes. <- <- Hope that helps. <- Seth <- <-
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2001 13:31:04 UTC