W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2001

Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol

From: Johan Hjelm, Nippon Ericsson KK <johan.hjelm@era-t.ericsson.se>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:52:48 +0900
Message-ID: <002e01c0b8b3$bfb152e0$e1d5ec96@nrj.ericsson.se>
To: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>, <frystyk@microsoft.com>, "Ken MacLeod" <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>, "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Cc: <rss-dev@egroups.com>
Er... I thought this was exactly what the XML Protocol activity was supposed
to do?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
To: <frystyk@microsoft.com>; "Ken MacLeod" <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>; "RDF
Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Cc: <rss-dev@egroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol

> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >> Is there a standard for this TCP binding so that we can
> >> compare it with what Ken has done?
> >
> > You can use the exact same mechanism for SOAP as Ken describes. The
> > reason for my mail was to put focus on the contents of the XML document
> > rather than on whether one wants to use one TCP binding over another. As
> > we are talking about XML documents in either case it is likely that a
> > solution for one would also apply to the other.
> I agree completely. Perhaps we should come up with some generic XML
> that is a superset of both RDF, SOAP and whatever else we come up with.
> Henrik and Ken, would you be interested in writing something quick up on
> this? I think it would be of great use to both the SOAP and RDF
> to share this standard.
> --
> [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2001 19:53:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:29 UTC