- From: Johan Hjelm, Nippon Ericsson KK <johan.hjelm@era-t.ericsson.se>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:49:02 +0900
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "Ken MacLeod" <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
- Cc: <rss-dev@egroups.com>
Actually, CC/PP is pretty much "passing pieces of RDF around", and there are several working implementations of the CC/PP-exchange protocol. I think that should be wheighed into the equation. Johan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken MacLeod" <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us> To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> Cc: <rss-dev@egroups.com> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 6:53 AM Subject: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol > RDF Protocol really isn't a protocol so much as setting down some > conventions for passing bits of RDF around. Well, ok, some of the > bits work a lot *like* a protocol, so it's gotta look like that, but > here goes: > > <http://bitsko.slc.ut.us/2001/03/rdf-protocol.html> > > I'm playing with a Python implementation of the basic message > read/write and using IRC as the example protocol to emulate, using > Dave Beckett's IRC in RDF schema. In case anyone was wondering, there > are no APIs and no RPCs at this layer, it's all XML instance passing, > with RDF triples as the content. > > -- Ken >
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2001 19:49:18 UTC