- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 11:14:30 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- cc: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote: > The spec explains how to deal with relationships > 3 (rdf:value) but not > those < 3 (i.e. two). I'd like to suggest we introduce two new properties: > > rdf:is rdf:type; create a "predicate" class whose members have the appropriate property. > rdf:isNot Yikes! Boom. That was the sound of the semantic web blowing up :-) This leads to non-monotonicity, which doesn't sit particularly well with the RDF worldview, as far as I can tell (no doubt the daml/oil people may say differently) -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk perl -e 's?ck?t??print:perl==pants if $_="Just Another Perl Hacker\n"'
Received on Friday, 9 March 2001 06:16:52 UTC