- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 21:09:27 -0600
- To: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- CC: RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
The spec explains how to deal with relationships > 3 (rdf:value) but not those < 3 (i.e. two). I'd like to suggest we introduce two new properties: rdf:is rdf:isNot This saves us from having to do something klugey like: <http://www.aaronsw.com/> bob:likesChocolate 0 . and also allows RDF processors to know that it's part of two-valued logic and treat it properly. -- Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>| The Info Network <http://www.aaronsw.com> | <http://theinfo.org> AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| the way you want the web to be
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2001 22:09:03 UTC