- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 19:51:32 -0800
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@upclink.com>, "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <barstow@w3.org>, "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
From: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org> > > (tab separated, ugh: Why not just use ASCII instead of Unicode while > you're at it?) Why the ugh ? What's the function of the file such that a simple ASCII tab delimited format would not be be adequate ... it's low tech .. essentially no programming ... available cross platform. As an implementor why do I need to program another parser interface when my tools read and write tab delimited naturally. > The <Statement> technique is tempting -- I started a writeup a while back > with the idea of it being a potential note. I was stumped when it came to > dealing with anonymous nodes; there are several conventions we might adopt > and none seemed particularly appealing or obvious. I agree. >Also we'd need to do > namespace declarations and language tagging properly... I thought the namespace was part of the triple once it went through the parsers. Seth
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2001 22:54:02 UTC