Re: Attention Users! (2 in a series)

Aaron Swartz  wrote:
> Sorry, my colleague informs me that the correct triple
> representation is:
>
> <#Car> a daml:Class .
> <#Person> a daml:Class .
> [ a daml:Disjoint; daml:first <#Car>; daml:rest (<#Person>) ] .
>
> So there is no reason to be alarmed,

Yes, this makes sense. Thanks, Aaron.
But now I am back to my original confusion:

<daml:Class rdf:ID="Car"/>
<daml:Class rdf:ID="Person"/>
<daml:Disjoint rdf:parseType="daml:collection">
  <daml:Class rdf:about="#Car"/>
  <daml:Class rdf:about="#Person"/>
</daml:Disjoint>

You originally said that "rdf:about" is used here to denote object versus
subject.
And yet in the triples both <#Car> and <#Person> are subjects.
What am I missing?

Thanks,


--Nikita.

----------------------------------------------
Nikita Ogievetsky, Consultant
Cogitech Inc.  XSLT and  topic maps tutorials.
email: nogievet@cogx.com, phone: (917) 406-8734
http://www.cogx.com      ||     Cogito Ergo XML