- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:35:10 -0500
- To: Stefan Kokkelink <skokkeli@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>
- Cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
On Thursday, July 12, 2001, at 07:28 AM, Stefan Kokkelink wrote:
> There is no problem with anonymous resources here. It
> is not said in sec 5 that a resource *must* be
> named by a URI! Sec 5 just talks about the *set* of
> resources. Sec 5 does not talk about a syntactic representation
> of triples that, for example, a parser may *choose* to
> represent the formal model.
Well, yes, but earlier in the spec M&S states clearly that:
"Resources are always named by URIs..."
This is under the original definition of resource, towards the
beginning of the spec.
Something has to give,
--
"Aaron Swartz" | ...schoolyard subversion...
<mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://aaronsw.com/school/>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> | because school makes kids dumb
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2001 13:35:14 UTC