- From: Ron Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 08:07:46 -0700
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, "Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Sorry, sloppy terminology on my part. Sean is correct that I should have said Property. Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean B. Palmer [mailto:sean@mysterylights.com] > Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 8:00 AM > To: Ron Daniel; Nikita Ogievetsky; www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org > Subject: Re: subject=predicate ? > > > > > is it valid from RDF standpoint (an why not?) > > > if subject and predicate are same? > > > > Nothing in the current M&S spec prevents this. > [...] > > A subject cannot be a *predicate* as I understand it, because the > predicate is always the piggy-in-the-middle as far as the triple is > concerned, but of course an instance of *property* (i.e. rdf:type(?x, > rdf:Property)) can be. I think that Nikita was in fact asking if a > property can be used as a subject. The answer, therefore, is "yes". > > -- > Kindest Regards, > Sean B. Palmer > @prefix: <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . >:Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2001 11:09:33 UTC