- From: Tim Serong <tims@ixla.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:57:41 +1100
- To: "'Sean B. Palmer'" <sean@mysterylights.com>, Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Cc: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Sean B. Palmer wrote: <snip/> > > Your completely right .. sorry i was confused. Do you > think I fixed it > by > > using square brackets to delimit URI ? > > That is quite a good idea. I wonder though about having [ ] > to imply a node > one minute, and then a URI the next. Is that O.K. - i.e. will people > understand that? > It does make the coding neat, but I suppose it would be very > difficult to > get a program to grok tht if you have different amount of > elements inside > the "[ ]" it means a completely different thing altogether. <snip/> RFC2732[1] allows the use of "[" and "]" within a URI for delimiting IPv6 addresses. For example http://[1080::8:800:200C:417A]/foo would be legal... Is this going to cause trouble with the above? Regards, Tim Serong <tims@ixla.com.au> -- [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2732.txt
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2001 20:55:19 UTC