- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 01:27:50 -0000
- To: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>
- Cc: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
"Seth Russell" wrote:- > [http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/] = [http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/#]. I'm really confused now... Why are you adding the "#" after it for, and calling them equivelent? These namespaces make completely different URIs when pieced back together again: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title is totally different from http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/#title BTW: I believe I was mistaken in thinking that DC redirects as appropriate. A better example would be the Wordnet namespace:- http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/ Note that http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/word *does* exist, whereas http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/#word does not. > Your completely right .. sorry i was confused. Do you think I fixed it by > using square brackets to delimit URI ? That is quite a good idea. I wonder though about having [ ] to imply a node one minute, and then a URI the next. Is that O.K. - i.e. will people understand that? It does make the coding neat, but I suppose it would be very difficult to get a program to grok tht if you have different amount of elements inside the "[ ]" it means a completely different thing altogether. Still, it's probably better than using <> because at least we can use it inside XML now. I suppose the next step is to ask: "what MIME type should N3 have?". text/plain for the moment I guess, but that implies that it is just "text, and not code", which it clearly isn't. > > I believe that percentage signs ("%") are only allowed to escape > > characters in URIs, so why not use them? > > The more weird characters you throw in the stream, the more it looks > like cyber gibberish and the more difficult it becomes for humans to > read and the more it offends the eye. Very good point. > How many times have you not been able to vance on a url in > a email because the author abutted it to a period. Millions... O.K., that's hyperbole - how about tens of thousands? > The square bracket solves that problem. Actually it didn't... my mail program still read the closing "]" as part of the URI! Sometimes it even thinks that an ">" is a part of the URI, and when typing them out, it sometimes includes whitespace as a part of it. I should really get a better mail client... -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . [ :name "Sean B. Palmer" ] :hasHomepage <http://infomesh.net/sbp/> . # or, as per Seth's suggestion:- @prefix : [http://webns.net/roughterms/] . [ :name "Sean B. Palmer" ] :hasHomepage [http://infomesh.net/sbp/] .
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2001 20:33:14 UTC