- From: Matola,Tod <matola@oclc.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:48:33 -0500
- To: "'Seth Russell'" <seth@robustai.net>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Seth Russell [mailto:seth@robustai.net] > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 9:32 AM > To: Libby Miller > Cc: McBride, Brian; www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Subject: Re: RDF IG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary 2001-02-28 > > > Libby Miller wrote: > > > > o Query - I'd be very interested to learn about ongoing > > > work in RDF query. > > > > I totally agree - once querying RDF is implemented well, a > whole lot of > > things get much easier. It would be excellent to compare notes with > > people working in this area. > > Personally I don't believe we want a query language outside > of RDF .. we > want it inside RDF. In other words we should be able to express a > question in RDF. See my proposal [1] for implementing the who, where, > when, why, what pronouns. > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Jan/0142.html > > Seth > > I agree as well. I have been leaning towards something like: RDF Query Specification [1] from Ashok Malhotra (IBM) <petsa@us.ibm.com> and Neel Sundaresan (IBM) <neel@almaden.ibm.com> Just wonder how others felt about it. Second what would the result of such a query (regardless of the QL) be? A list of triples, a list of lists of triples, a RDF document or list of RDF documents? Cheers Tod... [1] http://www.w3.org/TandS/QL/QL98/pp/rdfquery.html
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2001 12:48:42 UTC