- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:13:50 +0100
- To: " - *seth@robustai.net" <seth@robustai.net>
- Cc: " - *bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, " - *www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, " - *Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk" <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
> > > o Query - I'd be very interested to learn about ongoing > > > work in RDF query. > > > > I totally agree - once querying RDF is implemented well, a whole lot of > > things get much easier. It would be excellent to compare notes with > > people working in this area. > > Personally I don't believe we want a query language outside of RDF .. we > want it inside RDF. In other words we should be able to express a > question in RDF. See my proposal [1] for implementing the who, where, > when, why, what pronouns. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Jan/0142.html We could agree on that, and that's why we formulate so called *lemma*s (aka queries) in RDF/N3. For the moment they have the form of conjunctions (logical AND-ing). For examples see the *.lemma.n3 resources linked from http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/ Lemma results values (proof values) are also in RDF/N3 notation. -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2001 12:16:31 UTC