- From: Frank V. Castellucci <frankc@colconsulting.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 06:09:00 -0500
- To: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
- CC: "'Seth Russell'" <seth@robustai.net>, Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>, David Megginson <david@megginson.com>, xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, www-rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Bill dehOra wrote: > > > If > > [nodeX, propertyY, whatever] and; > > [nodeY, propertyY, whatever] and; > > [nodeX, rdf:type, nodeZ] and; > > [nodeY, rdf:type, nodeZ] and; > > [propertyY, atMostOneEntityValue, "yes"]; > > then > > smush (nodeX, nodeY). > > Isn't 'smushing' just unification hacking; am I missing something? > > -Bill > > ----- > Bill de hÓra : InterX : bdehora@interx.com It appears the intent is to do a semantic merge, which may mean that smushing = smashing = completing. -- Frank V. Castellucci http://corelinux.sourceforge.net OOA/OOD/C++ Standards and Guidelines for Linux
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 06:04:10 UTC