- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:45:19 +0300
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
teful. > > For the momement I have listed this message under 'further > discussion' of > the following issues: > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-uri > -substructure > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-qna > mes-cant-represent-all-uris > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-qna > me-uri-mapping I would also appreciate it being listed under rdfms-qnames-as-attrib-values as my preferred solution to this general mapping problem strongly pushes for such support of qnames in resource attribute values to achieve a consistency in the serialization model. Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 3 356 0209 Senior Research Scientist Mobile: +358 50 483 9453 Software Technology Laboratory Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Video: +358 3 356 0209 / 4227 Visiokatu 1, 33720 Tampere, Finland Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2001 07:45:53 UTC