- From: McBride, Brian <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 11:34:47 +0100
- To: "'Jan Grant'" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
- Cc: "'RDF Interest (E-mail)'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Hi Jan, Sorry, I've been a bit slow catching on to the concern. So the issue is: Is there a unique resource which represents a reified statement, or are there many. Is that it? I don't have a clear argument one way or the other at the moment. Do you have a reason for preferring many? Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Grant [mailto:Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk] > Sent: 15 September 2000 09:30 > To: Graham Klyne > Cc: McBride, Brian; 'RDF Interest (E-mail)' > Subject: RE: abstract model > > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Graham Klyne wrote: > > > Consider, if you have an RDF model (per M&S section 5 > formal model) containing: > > > > [A] --type------> [Statement] > > [A] --subject---> [S] > > [A] --property--> [P] > > [A] --object----> [O] > > > > [B] --type------> [Statement] > > [B] --subject---> [S] > > [B] --property--> [P] > > [B] --object----> [O] > > > > [S] --P---------> [O] > > > > There is no way to know if [A] or [B] is the reification of > "[S] --P--> [O]". > > This is the problem I have, thus why I proposed the "is a reification > of" relationship over the notion of a direct mapping. > > The paper at > http://nestroy.wi-inf.uni-essen.de/rdf/logical_interpretation/ index.html seems to imply this interpretation too; the Reification mapping is not single-valued. jan PS. What are the engineering implications of the Reification mapping that Brian proposes? - does a statement's reification have a URI? (or more than one, since a reification is a resource which may have multiple URIs that symbolise it)* - in which case is there a way of determining that URI for any particular reification? - given a URI (or just a resource) is there a way of determining which statement, if any, it reifies? PPS. I've no problem with Brian's intuition about "Jan made a statement about Dan, but I'm not exactly sure what" - it's a nice idea, but I don't think it justifies a "the reification" viewpoint. * Can of worms stuff apparently. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk Bolstered by my success with vi, I proceeded to learn C with 'learn c'.
Received on Friday, 15 September 2000 06:34:52 UTC