- From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 12:17:40 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- CC: Greg FitzPatrick <greg.fitzpatrick@metamatrix.se>, Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>, "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'RDF Interest (E-mail)'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Dan Brickley wrote:
> I suspect this wormcan stems in part from our need to be clearer about
> distinguishing between 'statement' in the sense of state-able thing, and a
> statement as a social act with date, time, person etc associated...
reminds me of a thread of that list we had, quite a long time ago
we used to distinguish statements (state-able things) and statings (social act).
pA
--- Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Whatever is said in Latin sounds important.
Received on Friday, 15 September 2000 06:17:39 UTC