W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2000

Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF

From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 14:17:09 -0700
Message-ID: <39B562D5.72D6F809@db.stanford.edu>
To: Wolfram Conen <conen@wi-inf.uni-essen.de>
CC: "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Wolfram Conen wrote:
> ...
 
> PS: Still reasoning about "Why are statements not a subset of resource?"


Making statements be resources simplifies both the logical model and
implementation. In some RDF APIs (including Stanford one), statements
are resources.

Sergey

Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2000 17:01:44 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Rose Dieng: "EKAW'2000 2nd Call for participation"
Previous message: Graham Klyne: "RDF and contexts -- discussion paper"
In reply to: Wolfram Conen: "Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF"
Next in thread: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN: "Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:24 UTC