W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2000

Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF

From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 14:17:09 -0700
Message-ID: <39B562D5.72D6F809@db.stanford.edu>
To: Wolfram Conen <conen@wi-inf.uni-essen.de>
CC: "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Wolfram Conen wrote:
> ...
> PS: Still reasoning about "Why are statements not a subset of resource?"

Making statements be resources simplifies both the logical model and
implementation. In some RDF APIs (including Stanford one), statements
are resources.

Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2000 17:01:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:24 UTC