- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 15:56:50 -0000
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "William Loughborough" <love26@gorge.net>
> <link rel="meta" type="***" href="meta.rdf" /> > > where *** is the MIME type of the information. I am not sure if RDF parsers > automatically understand this, They don't automatically understand profile either, so it doesn't matter much. Having said that, in an XML Schmea version of XHTML, profile wuld/could be explicitly defined as being for RDF metadata linking, so that would be my preffered method for now. > , but it is how the HTML specification says to do it, as I read it. > And it is understood by smart browsers (lynx, iCab) so > if you have an RDF rendering plugin you can make it happen... HTML says use meta or head@profile, but overall doesn't really care much about metadata, which is quite annoying for us. The idea of an RDF rendering plugin is a good one... [GL joke[[ > My preferred method (as used in Authoring Tool Accessibility > Guidelines, because I am an editor of it <grin/> [...] In that case, get started on WCAG 2.0! ]]] Are there any other ways to put RDF legally in XHTML other than: head@profile, meta@name=meta, and meta@ content=DC.x? Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/swr/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/ "Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics." - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.
Received on Thursday, 23 November 2000 10:58:25 UTC