- From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:46:41 +0100
- To: "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: "'Jonas Liljegren'" <jonas@rit.se>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>, RDF-IG <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
"McBride, Brian" wrote: > A good distinction. Again from M&S 4.1: > > A new resource with the above four properties represents > the original statement ... Does not proove much since we still have to know if "statement" means "stating" or "abstract statement"... The argument from the formal model (about Statement being a *set*) is more convincing to me. And not less annoying : that would mean that any two resources having the same type, subject, predicate and object should be unified, which is quite yuck-y ! Pierre-Antoine -- Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us. (Bill Watterson -- Calvin & Hobbes)
Received on Monday, 20 November 2000 10:48:52 UTC