- From: Tom Van Eetvelde <tom.van_eetvelde@alcatel.be>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 17:37:23 +0100
- To: "Frank V. Castellucci" <frankc@colconsulting.com>
- CC: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2000 11:40:07 UTC
Hello Frank,
I do not quite catch what you are hinting at. Do you mean that the 'context' problem can easily be solved
via Conceptual Graphs? I also cannot interpret your model. Maybe I am not familiar with the way
conceptual graphs are written down or maybe your markup got lost in the email traversal process.
Greetings,
Tom.
"Frank V. Castellucci" wrote:
> Thats the interesting "problem" of semantics implied via the conceptual
> graphs:
>
> I could model
>
> Car
> have colors
> Big Car
> Small Car
>
> Company
> FordCompany
> FordCars
> FordEscort isA Small Car
> colors = {Red, White, Blue,etc}
>
> Or
>
> Car
> have colors
> Big Car
> Small Car
> FordEscort isA FordCars
>
> Company
> FordCompany
> FordCars
>
> or probably a few other ways.
>
> In the large, the conceptualization which enforce the semantics for
> reasoning will have to whistle approximate tunes.
>
> BTW: the colors enumeration specializes colors to restrict instances to
> just "pick" from one of those, and of course the logic to enforce it.
>
> --
> Frank V. Castellucci
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2000 11:40:07 UTC