- From: Tom Van Eetvelde <tom.van_eetvelde@alcatel.be>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 17:37:23 +0100
- To: "Frank V. Castellucci" <frankc@colconsulting.com>
- CC: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2000 11:40:07 UTC
Hello Frank, I do not quite catch what you are hinting at. Do you mean that the 'context' problem can easily be solved via Conceptual Graphs? I also cannot interpret your model. Maybe I am not familiar with the way conceptual graphs are written down or maybe your markup got lost in the email traversal process. Greetings, Tom. "Frank V. Castellucci" wrote: > Thats the interesting "problem" of semantics implied via the conceptual > graphs: > > I could model > > Car > have colors > Big Car > Small Car > > Company > FordCompany > FordCars > FordEscort isA Small Car > colors = {Red, White, Blue,etc} > > Or > > Car > have colors > Big Car > Small Car > FordEscort isA FordCars > > Company > FordCompany > FordCars > > or probably a few other ways. > > In the large, the conceptualization which enforce the semantics for > reasoning will have to whistle approximate tunes. > > BTW: the colors enumeration specializes colors to restrict instances to > just "pick" from one of those, and of course the logic to enforce it. > > -- > Frank V. Castellucci
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2000 11:40:07 UTC