- From: Jeff Sussna <jeff.sussna@quokka.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 12:37:18 -0800
- To: "'caro@Adobe.COM'" <caro@Adobe.COM>, RDF-list <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
100% agreed. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Perry A. Caro [mailto:caro@Adobe.COM] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 12:25 PM To: RDF-list Subject: Re: Acyclic RDF Graph??? I hope that cycles are discouraged, rather than encouraged. I agree that the specification allows them (the RDFMS says "directed labeled graph", not "directed labeled acyclic graph"), but I'm not sure it should be recommended best practice. All of us poor implementors trying to persist our models in RDBMS and similar cycle unfriendly systems have to deal with cycles, but the assumption I've been making is that cycles will be uncommon. It's hard to optimize lookups otherwise. Perry
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2000 15:29:34 UTC