- From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 16:45:33 -0500
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I have only been half paying attention to this discussion, but wanted to put forward another example of a group that considered using RDF and decided not to and why. The W3C P3P group (see http://www.w3.org/P3P/) had originally planned to use RDF to encode website privacy policies. Two years into the project at W3C, the group decided to abandon RDF and just use XML (although we tried to maintain a syntax that could be modeled easily with RDF and thus could be translated to RDF if somebody wanted to). We had lengthy discussions about this, but basically what it came down to was a feeling that an RDF encoding would be useful to us IFF P3P developers were likely to already have RDF parsers available to them in the tools in which they were embedding P3P user agents. If RDF parsers were not available, implementers would either have to implement them first (making implementation more difficult), or write a special-purpose parser that pretty much ignores all the advantages of using RDF. Given that not a single one of our perspective implementers had any plans to use RDF (other than the W3C itself), we could not in good conscience put this extra burden on implementers. We do, however, include an RDF data model diagram in the P3P spec (see http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-P3P-20000211/#Appendix_RDF ) which gives some idea of how our syntax maps onto RDF. Also note that during the two years we were planning on using RDF we went through many syntax rewrites, in part due to the changes made in RDF over that time and in part due to our changing understanding (or lack of understanding) of the RDF spec. I believe we finally understood it in the end, and we did finally figure out how to use it correctly. (W3C members see http://www.w3.org/P3P/Group/Specification/rdf.html ). But by that point we decided it was not worth the effort. Lorrie Cranor P3P Specification Working Group Chair ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lorrie Faith Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com> AT&T Labs-Research, Shannon Laboratory 180 Park Ave. Room A241, Florham Park, NJ 07932 Phone: 973-360-8607 FAX: 973-360-8970 http://www.research.att.com/~lorrie/
Received on Monday, 28 February 2000 16:47:13 UTC