- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:07:19 -0800
- To: Arjun Ray <aray@q2.net>
- Cc: xml-dev@xml.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Arjun Ray wrote: > > > RDF should be an "architecture" not a "framework". RDF should > > have a DTD > > Isn't the doctrine - think the right think - from 50000 ft to kill off > DTDs? One would have to wonder about the philosophy of any organization which is trying to "kill off" a solution that's been working quite well for a decade or so ... in evident favor of approaches which are at best still in development and don't have anything like the same degre of proof-in-practice. Any "right think" shouldn't involve sticks (killing), but carrots. Any "right think" needs to accept that the solution for one problem may not be an appropriate solution for a different problem. - Dave p.s. My point doesn't relate to RDF or RDF DTDs at all.
Received on Monday, 28 February 2000 15:07:39 UTC