W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2000

Re: SV: A certain difficulty - lack of action!

From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:35:13 -0800
Message-ID: <38BA3341.614E368@db.stanford.edu>
To: RDF Interest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Thanks Dan, I look forward to hearing about the options. IMO a W3C Note
would be enough (I don't like politics). As to syntax: XLink may be a
viable alternative. Can anyone XLink-aware come up with a simple example
showing RDF/XLink serialization?


Dan Brickley wrote:
> Variations on this idea have been discussed a number of times. I'll
> try to get some clarification about what the options are within W3C
> process and report back
> (for example. a W3C Note would be much easier than getting a new REC
> through the full-blown W3C working group process).
> Would an 'RDF Model' Note on the W3C site do the job, where that note
> re-articulated the Model component of the Model and Syntax spec, or is
> there a perceived need for a new RDF Model 'RECommendation'?
> Regarding the 'poor man' serialisation syntax, I'd very much like to see
> this. I do think we owe it to the XLink folks to try an XLink-based
> approach to this before inventing something new...
> Dan
Received on Monday, 28 February 2000 03:26:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:22 UTC