- From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:35:13 -0800
- To: RDF Interest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Thanks Dan, I look forward to hearing about the options. IMO a W3C Note would be enough (I don't like politics). As to syntax: XLink may be a viable alternative. Can anyone XLink-aware come up with a simple example showing RDF/XLink serialization? Sergey Dan Brickley wrote: > > Variations on this idea have been discussed a number of times. I'll > try to get some clarification about what the options are within W3C > process and report back > (for example. a W3C Note would be much easier than getting a new REC > through the full-blown W3C working group process). > > Would an 'RDF Model' Note on the W3C site do the job, where that note > re-articulated the Model component of the Model and Syntax spec, or is > there a perceived need for a new RDF Model 'RECommendation'? > > Regarding the 'poor man' serialisation syntax, I'd very much like to see > this. I do think we owe it to the XLink folks to try an XLink-based > approach to this before inventing something new... > > Dan
Received on Monday, 28 February 2000 03:26:59 UTC