- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Date: 25 Feb 2000 06:20:57 -0500
- To: xml-dev@xml.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net> writes: > > Generally speaking, a complicated design is a bad design. > > I'd like to see the mathematical proof for that one! Once again you > are introducing value judgements. Jeff's proof would be a statistical one, not a mathematical one. His argument, which would probably be born out by investigation, is that all other things being the same a more complicated design is significantly less likely to be implemented fully than a simpler design. All the best, David -- David Megginson david@megginson.com http://www.megginson.com/
Received on Friday, 25 February 2000 06:22:10 UTC