- From: Curt Arnold <carnold@houston.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 20:29:35 -0600
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > I suppose we could use > http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xmlschema-2-19991217/#boolean > for the value of the rdf:range property, but that doesn't work > for user-defined derived types. For user-defined datatypes, you could do some concatenation of the target namespace and the datatype name, for example: <schema targetNamespace="http://www.software.aeat.com/xml/namespaces/datatypes"> <datatype name="pressure" source="double"> <minExclusive value="0.0"/> </datatype> </schema> Pressure could be refered to as http://www.software.aeat.com/xml/namespaces/datatypes:pressure (I'm not sure if the ":" would be legal in that location in a URI, but you could substitute another separator). That wouldn't give you a way to locate a schema that defines in, since the namespace would only be loosely coupled with the schema location, but it should uniquely identify the unit. Then for consistency, you could define a namespace for XML Schema defined types, so double could be something like http://www.w3.org/XMLSchema/Datatypes:double
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2000 21:36:55 UTC