- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:50:35 -0000
- To: <swi-dev@egroups.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
According to Tim Berners-Lee: "The Semantic Web is a Web that includes documents, or portions of documents, describing explicit relationships between things and containing semantic information intended for automated processing by our machines." [1] The problem is, out of the WWW as we have today, how much of it is intended for automated processing by our machines? Although all of it gets processed, 99% of it is there for human consumption. The very reason I started swi-dev was to investigate if the Semantic Web would be for machines or humans. I believe that all of the useful things at the moment in RDF have to be done with prose descriptions: look at RDF Schemas and compare to the DC and RSS specifications. The Schema layer, when applied to RDF, will be the downfall of the Semantic Web, simply because it isn't viable to apply XML Schemas to RDF. That's not to say that RDF isn't going to be useful. We already have RSS and DC, and EDL is on its way (I hope). It's just that I don't see much of a future for a "machines talking to machines" Web, if there aren't any moves to make the human interaction to it as seamless as possible. Of course, I hope I'm wrong. To quote Edd's recent XML.com article [2]: "Encouraging the audience to share his excitement at the vision, Berners-Lee related how difficult it was ten years ago when he was demonstrating the Web for the first time. Viewers seeing him progress from one document to another by clicking on links were nonplussed -- it's when the system scales that the advantages may be reaped." This was originally titled "Why the Semantic Web will fail", but I think even if the Semantic Web didn't take off in the same way as the WWW, it will still be useful. [1] http://www.w3.org/1999/04/WebData [2] http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2000/12/xml2000/timbl.html Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer http://www.mysterylights.com/sbp/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF] "Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics." - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2000 06:52:06 UTC