- From: Ora Lassila <daml@lassila.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 21:57:42 -0500
- To: timbl@w3.org
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Tim, sorry, I missed this when it was first posted. Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > in that it says that "A property can have at most one range property. " > This basically doens't mean anything on the web. Yes, this is a bug, and having to reconvene the RDFS WG (since this is not a mere editorial change) is an obstacle for pushing RDFS forward in the W3C process. > (Why haven't I spotted that before? I guess just skipped over range and > domain > assuming they had their normal meanings). I have a distinct recollection that you and I had lengthy discussions about this last spring. Anyway, I fear that this bug is related to a greater problem in RDFS which begs to be addressed: properties of properties (such as range) should be defined on a per-class basis - kinda tricky in our property-centric approach. > Please remove the offending wording from the spec. As I said, we need to "rehydrate" the WG to do this. - Ora -- Ora Lassila <daml@lassila.org> +1 (781) 993-4603
Received on Friday, 8 December 2000 21:57:49 UTC