RE: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements

> topic: Implications of using the statement id
> see: http://ilrt.org/discovery/2000/11/statements/#3.1
> text:  However, when a reified statement is given a URI via 
> the ID attribute then
> this implies that any reified statement with that URI is 
> referring to the same
> stating.
> 
> So is this registering somewhere as a consensus?  Is there 
> any dissent?

Well, not dissent really.  I'd just remind you that this is
not what the spec says, to wit:

  a statement is a triple (s,p,o)

and

  a reified statement represents a statement.

Note - a statement, as defined in m&s, not a stating.

It can be hard to track the arguments through a mail thread,
and be sure that everything has been covered.  Seth, would
you like to summarize the case for making this change.  That
would sure help clarify things.

Brian