> topic: Implications of using the statement id > see: http://ilrt.org/discovery/2000/11/statements/#3.1 > text: However, when a reified statement is given a URI via > the ID attribute then > this implies that any reified statement with that URI is > referring to the same > stating. > > So is this registering somewhere as a consensus? Is there > any dissent? Well, not dissent really. I'd just remind you that this is not what the spec says, to wit: a statement is a triple (s,p,o) and a reified statement represents a statement. Note - a statement, as defined in m&s, not a stating. It can be hard to track the arguments through a mail thread, and be sure that everything has been covered. Seth, would you like to summarize the case for making this change. That would sure help clarify things. BrianReceived on Monday, 4 December 2000 04:37:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:27 UTC