- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 10:15:47 -0800
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
- CC: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, www-rdf-interest@w3c.org
Graham Klyne wrote: > At 02:46 PM 11/28/00 +0000, Libby Miller wrote: > > >http://ilrt.org/discovery/2000/11/statements/ > > If one document or context makes an assertion about the statement [r], and > some other document makes a different assertion using the same URI for [r], > then they are assertions about the *same* stating, even though the > reification is invoked in very different places. > > >However, when a reified statement is given a URI via the ID attribute then > >this implies that any reified statement with that URI is referring to > >the same stating. > > Yes. Yes. topic: Implications of using the statement id see: http://ilrt.org/discovery/2000/11/statements/#3.1 text: However, when a reified statement is given a URI via the ID attribute then this implies that any reified statement with that URI is referring to the same stating. So is this registering somewhere as a consensus? Is there any dissent? Seth Russell
Received on Sunday, 3 December 2000 13:13:10 UTC