Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements

Graham Klyne wrote:

> At 02:46 PM 11/28/00 +0000, Libby Miller wrote:
>
> >http://ilrt.org/discovery/2000/11/statements/
>
> If one document or context makes an assertion about the statement [r], and
> some other document makes a different assertion using the same URI for [r],
> then they are assertions about the *same* stating, even though the
> reification is invoked in very different places.
>
> >However, when a reified statement is given a URI via the ID attribute then
> >this implies that any reified statement with that URI is referring to
> >the same stating.
>
> Yes.

Yes.

topic: Implications of using the statement id
see: http://ilrt.org/discovery/2000/11/statements/#3.1
text:  However, when a reified statement is given a URI via the ID attribute then
this implies that any reified statement with that URI is referring to the same
stating.

So is this registering somewhere as a consensus?  Is there any dissent?

Seth Russell