W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2000

RE: Update to XLink -> RDF mapping

From: Ron Daniel <rdaniel@metacode.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 08:51:10 -0700
Message-ID: <0D611E39F997D0119F9100A0C931315C95B5AE@datafusionnt1>
To: "'Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN'" <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>, w3c-xml-linking-ig@w3.org
Cc: w3c-xml-linking-ig@w3.org, ML RDF-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3c.org>
Thanks for the comments...

A follow-up question for the various groups who get this.

In the case that no arcrole attribute was specified,
I put in the stuff about using the element type as the
arc role. My thinking was that this would be a common
case, and while such inference will lead to more errors, it
will also allow harvesting of a much wider range of resources.

But as Pierre-Antoine correctly points out, it is not safe
in general to make up a URI by concatenating the namespace
URI and the element type.

1) Leave as-is (it says that implementations 'may' do this).
2) Delete, only harvest statements when an arc-role is
   specified. ("First do no harm" :-)
3) Leave as 'may' and add a note on the dangers.
4) Generate a standard relation, such as Pierre-Antoine's
   suggestion of
5) Something else?

Your opinions please.
Received on Monday, 28 August 2000 11:51:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:24 UTC