Re: lists and other facts and rules in RDF

I was mistaken, the proof of
[data:c e:in [data:a e:list [data:b e:list [data:c e:list e:empty]]]]

is actually
[e:ok e:and
[e:ok e:and
[e:ok e:and
[data:c e:in [data:c e:list e:empty]]] e:thus
[data:c e:in [data:b e:list [data:c e:list e:empty]]]] e:thus
[data:c e:in [data:a e:list [data:b e:list [data:c e:list e:empty]]]]]

--
Jos De Roo -- AGFA

Received on Friday, 11 August 2000 06:34:40 UTC