- From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN <no email>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 08:49:51 +0100
- To: Mark Papiani <mp@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Mark Papiani wrote: > However, XML Schema Structures also states that it has > not yet documented requirements or dependencies RDF Schema. This has been done since. Have a look at the Cambridge Communique : http://www.w3.org/1999/08/27-communique > Please could someone explain if there is a relationship between the two > and why there are multiple specifications being developed for XML > Schemas. Do they solve different problems, or are they just > alternatives? I think (and I read the Cambridge Communique this way) that XML Schemas and RDF Schemas address different problems : the information content of an XML document is a tree structure, which nodes are defined in the document, since the information content of an RDF document is a direct labelled graph, which nodes are resource, often existing outside the document. Schemas are used to constrain the structure of the information content of a document (or group of documents). Since the information content of XML docs and RDF docs hzvr inherently different structures, XML schemas and RDF schemas do not address the same goals -- even if some concepts (such has inheritance) are used by both. Hope this'll help Pierre-Antoine
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 1999 02:53:47 UTC