- From: Seth Russell <seth@halcyon.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:55:06 -0800
- To: RDF Intrest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN wrote: > Jonas Liljegren wrote: > > I suggest: > > - that ALL URI's representing retrievable data, will be considerd > > literals. > > - that each mime type will be a sub class to Literal > > Furthermore, > I suggest that there be no more distinction between > triple(resource,resource,resource) and triple(resource,resource,litteral) > but that RDF looking like > > <rdf:Description about="http://somewhere.org/something"> > <s:prop> This is a litteral </s:prop> > </rdf:Description> > > be translated something like > > triple( s:prop, http://somewhere.com/something, thisfile.rdf#genid1 ) > > where "thisfile.rdf#genid1" whould have "This is a litteral" as CONTENT... > which surely would raise some implementation issues left to discuss! > Though, that looks sound to me. Excuse me for asking what might seem to some like a really stupid question. But suppose then we want to say something about "this literal" ... would we then write: <rdf:Description about="This is a litteral"> <s:propB> Wanna take a bath</s:propB> </rdf:Description> ___OR___ <rdf:Description about="thisfile.rdf#genid1"> <s:propB>Wanna take a bath</s:propB> </rdf:Description> Seth Russell http://RobustAI.Net/ai/symknow.htm
Received on Monday, 22 November 1999 11:25:40 UTC