- From: Perry A. Caro <caro@Adobe.COM>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 11:58:10 -0800
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Thank you, Sergey and Tim. I think this direction looks very promising. Questions: what about containers? Let's say I have the following property attached to a document with WebDAV: <D:prop> <meta> <rdf:RDF> <rdf:Description about="" xmlns:dc="..."> <dc:title> <rdf:Alt> <rdf:li xml:lang="en-us">English Title</rdf:li> <rdf:li xml:lang="fr">French Title</rdf:li> </rdf:Alt> </dc:title> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> </meta> </D:prop> How would I express this, with either proposed simplification? I hope the answer isn't conversion to the rdf:_1, rdf:_2, etc. notation, which is no simplification if you ask me. >From a purely XSLT/XPath manipulation point-of-view, the simplification I'd like to see is something like the following: <dc:title> <rdf:Alt xml:lang="en-us">English Title</rdf:Alt> <rdf:Alt xml:lang="fr">French Title</rdf:Alt> </dc:title> ======================= Question: What about parseType='Literal'? This is the flip-side issue of the opaqueness/transparency (with respect to RDF processing) issue. Perry
Received on Friday, 19 November 1999 14:58:34 UTC