- From: Perry A. Caro <caro@Adobe.COM>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 11:58:10 -0800
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Thank you, Sergey and Tim. I think this direction looks very promising.
Questions: what about containers? Let's say I have the following property
attached to a document with WebDAV:
<D:prop>
<meta>
<rdf:RDF>
<rdf:Description about="" xmlns:dc="...">
<dc:title>
<rdf:Alt>
<rdf:li xml:lang="en-us">English Title</rdf:li>
<rdf:li xml:lang="fr">French Title</rdf:li>
</rdf:Alt>
</dc:title>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
</meta>
</D:prop>
How would I express this, with either proposed simplification? I hope the
answer isn't conversion to the rdf:_1, rdf:_2, etc. notation, which is no
simplification if you ask me.
>From a purely XSLT/XPath manipulation point-of-view, the simplification I'd
like to see is something like the following:
<dc:title>
<rdf:Alt xml:lang="en-us">English Title</rdf:Alt>
<rdf:Alt xml:lang="fr">French Title</rdf:Alt>
</dc:title>
=======================
Question: What about parseType='Literal'? This is the flip-side issue of
the opaqueness/transparency (with respect to RDF processing) issue.
Perry
Received on Friday, 19 November 1999 14:58:34 UTC