- From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@jfinity.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 14:47:18 -0800
- To: "www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I'm including a little testcase (and output) that has two versions of
a "li" content. In both cases the value of the li is an inline resource.
In the first case, I use the typedNode syntax and in the second I use
the regular syntax. The second one causes SiRPAC to emit the reification
of the properties. The first doesn't. What should be happening here ?
Gabe Beged-Dov
http://www.jfinity.com/gabe
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<rdf:Bag>
<rdf:li>
<typedNode rdf:ID="44">
<prop>a value</prop>
</typedNode>
</rdf:li>
<rdf:li>
<rdf:Description rdf:ID="45">
<prop>a value</prop>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:li>
</rdf:Bag>
</rdf:RDF>
triple("rdf#type","file:RDF/test.xml#genid1","rdf#Bag").
triple("rdf#type","file:RDF/test.xml#44","typedNode").
triple("prop","file:/RDF/test.xml#44","a value").
triple("rdf#_1","file:RDF/test.xml#genid1","file:RDF/test.xml#44").
triple("prop","file:RDF/test.xml#45","a value").
triple("rdf#predicate","file:RDF/test.xml#genid2","prop").
triple("rdf#subject","file:RDF/test.xml#genid2","file:RDF/test.xml#45").
triple("rdf#object","file:RDF/test.xml#genid2","a value").
triple("rdf#type","file:RDF/test.xml#genid2","rdf#Statement").
triple("rdf#_2","file:RDF/test.xml#genid1","file:RDF/test.xml#45").
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 1999 18:58:50 UTC