- From: <JOS.DEROO.JD@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 12:07:56 +0100
- To: " - *melnik@db.stanford.edu" <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Cc: " - *www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sergey, We start with the following (hypothetical) statements: <?xml version="1.0"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:r="http://www.agfa.com/x#"> <rdf:Description about="http://www.agfa.com/a" r:b="c"/> <rdf:Description about="http://www.agfa.com/a" r:b="d"/> </rdf:RDF> After running ParseAndSerialize we get : <?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:a="http://www.agfa.com/x#"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.agfa.com/a" a:b="c" a:b="d"/> </rdf:RDF> Running ParseAndSerialize on this model we get: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:a="http://www.agfa.com/x#"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.agfa.com/a" a:b="c"/> </rdf:RDF> So we loose a statement and get a different model. On the other hand, the following example is OK: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:a="http://www.agfa.com/x#"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.agfa.com/a"> <a:b rdf:resource="http://c"/> <a:b rdf:resource="http://d"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> What can we think about that? With kind regards and best wishes, Jos De Roo --- Agfa
Received on Thursday, 23 December 1999 06:07:46 UTC