- From: <JOS.DEROO.JD@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 12:07:56 +0100
- To: " - *melnik@db.stanford.edu" <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Cc: " - *www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sergey,
We start with the following (hypothetical) statements:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:r="http://www.agfa.com/x#">
<rdf:Description about="http://www.agfa.com/a" r:b="c"/>
<rdf:Description about="http://www.agfa.com/a" r:b="d"/>
</rdf:RDF>
After running ParseAndSerialize we get :
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:a="http://www.agfa.com/x#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.agfa.com/a"
a:b="c"
a:b="d"/>
</rdf:RDF>
Running ParseAndSerialize on this model we get:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:a="http://www.agfa.com/x#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.agfa.com/a"
a:b="c"/>
</rdf:RDF>
So we loose a statement and get a different model.
On the other hand, the following example is OK:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:a="http://www.agfa.com/x#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.agfa.com/a">
<a:b rdf:resource="http://c"/>
<a:b rdf:resource="http://d"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
What can we think about that?
With kind regards and best wishes,
Jos De Roo --- Agfa
Received on Thursday, 23 December 1999 06:07:46 UTC