- From: Butler, Mark <mark-h.butler@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:37:12 +0100
- To: "'Stefano Mazzocchi'" <stefano@apache.org>, simile general <www-rdf-dspace@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 7 June 2004 06:42:13 UTC
RE: MADS > Converting this schema to a useful RDF is algorithmically impossible > since too much information is kept implicit and/or optional. I don't think its impossible - for example of how to do it, see the enclosed XSLT stylesheet which demonstrates how to convert the examples. Writing XML in this way is quite a useful design pattern for getting RDF-like extensibility in XML while retaining compatibility with things like WSDL based web services, where we have to write an XML Schema to describe our data. Writing such a schema limits our ability to add extensions, so one way to overcome this is to use attributes to encode property names, as this frees us from the schema constraint. Of course once we are free of the schema constraint, then we lose our ability to validate, but then that's a problem we have with RDF as well. Mark
Received on Monday, 7 June 2004 06:42:13 UTC