RE: Issue 61: Why is metadata annotation a special case?

I propose:

"We would like to be able to support arbitrary, ad hoc
annotations to metadata schemas and instance metadata, and indeed any resource within the system. In many systems resources such as schemas and instance elements are difficult or impossible to annotate, especially in an ad-hoc manner.  However such annotations could be supplied by
information consumers directly, by external domain experts, 
by collections managers, or by automated techniques such as collection data 
mining."

David, does that work for you?

- Mick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David François Huynh [mailto:dfhuynh@ai.mit.edu] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 2:58 PM
> To: 'Bass, Mick'
> Cc: 'Butler, Mark'; www-rdf-dspace@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Issue 61: Why is metadata annotation a special case?
> 
> 
> Mick,
> 
> I'm sorry I cannot seem to bring my mind back to that 
> comment. I cannot recall exactly what I meant by it.
> 
> It could be that, in working with RDF, the distinction 
> between data and metadata has been so blurred in my mind that 
> "arbitrary, ad hoc annotations" seems like a trivial thing, a 
> general need which ought to be supported on anything, not 
> just particularly metadata schemas and instance metadata.
> 
> I'll be more specific and detailed in my future comments.
> 
> David
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bass, Mick [mailto:mick.bass@hp.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 2:33 PM
> > To: David François Huynh
> > Cc: Butler, Mark; ' (www-rdf-dspace@w3.org)'
> > Subject: RE: Issue 61: Why is metadata annotation a special case?
> > 
> > 
> > David:  you wrote "I'm not sure why this can't be a special
> > case of something else."
> > 
> > If you can bring your mind back to that comment, are you able
> > to suggest text describing the more general case of which 
> > annotation of metadata schemas, instances and instance 
> > elements is a special case?
> > 
> > And if so, do you believe the focus should be on the general
> > case, or the special case described?
> > 
> > I think the point stressed in the document is that in many
> > existing systems it is easy to provide metadata about certain 
> > objects, but difficult to provide metadata about others.  
> > Schemas, instances, and elements within the instances are an 
> > example of some of the types of resources that are difficult 
> > to annotate in many systems.
> >  
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Butler, Mark [mailto:Mark_Butler@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 12:34 PM
> > > To: ' (www-rdf-dspace@w3.org)'
> > > Subject: Issue 61: Why is metadata annotation a special case?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Mick, team
> > > 
> > > Any comments on this and metadata annotation? Should we keep
> > > it or subsume it into one of the other definitions?
> > > 
> > > [ 061. ]
> > > Summary: Section 2.3 Why is metadata annotation a special
> > > case? Raised By: David Hunyh
> > > Status: open
> > > Description: 
> > > 
> > > We would like to be able to support arbitrary, ad hoc
> > annotations to
> > > metadata schemas and instance metadata. These could be supplied by
> > > information consumers directly, by external domain experts, 
> > > by collections 
> > > managers, or by automated techniques such as collection data 
> > > mining. [I'm not 
> > > sure why this can't be a special case of something else.] 
> > > 
> > 
>

Received on Thursday, 22 May 2003 15:09:50 UTC