- From: Kevin Smathers <ks@micky.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:43:58 -0800
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <Andy_Seaborne@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "'www-rdf-dspace@w3.org'" <www-rdf-dspace@w3.org>
Hi Andy, Mick and I have been working on describing a demonstrator which brings out some of the issues surrounding distribution (I've been describing the distribution problem from Genesis' perspective, and Mick has been translating into Simile's application domain.) On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 02:45:07PM +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: [...] > The Semantic Web isn't a number of closed worlds so information from SIMILE > will be reused by other systems, whether portals, client-end applications or > something else. The current document covers this. The other way round is > also interesting - how does SIMILE use semantic web information from > elsewhere? Library information can be ingested but what about dynamic > information? > > Examples: schedules related to course material. Other papers in the same > track or same session at a conference. I think that the demo will address this. The mechanism used for sharing of external metadata should be similar to the mechanism used to share metadata from other Simile installations. If so then RDF becomes a transport format; extraction and creation RDF from the data in the system is through ingest and publish tools. > > On the semantic web, the client is programmatically accessing SIMILE, or by > web page, so issues of client-side caching, change notification arise, as do > security, and, potentially, charging and SLAs. This is the first I've heard of this. I thought Simile was a standard web architecture application, using a web browser as the client. -- ======================================================== Kevin Smathers kevin.smathers@hp.com Hewlett-Packard kevin@ank.com Palo Alto Research Lab 1501 Page Mill Rd. 650-857-4477 work M/S 1135 650-852-8186 fax Palo Alto, CA 94304 510-247-1031 home ======================================================== use "Standard::Disclaimer"; carp("This message was printed on 100% recycled bits.");
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 18:21:32 UTC