- From: Hardgrave, Terry \(Contractor\) <Terry.Hardgrave@ed.gov>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:55:20 -0400
- To: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:55:34 UTC
RDF Team-- My suggestion is that you base the formal semantics of RDF on the work of Chris Strachey, Dana Scott, etc. -- i.e. on "denotational semantics" and set theory-- rather than on model-theory/graph-theory. The primary reason is that graph theory will not (easily) support Boolean query languages on the structures. To support the semantics of Boolean query languages, you need to use set-theory directly. Chris Strachey developed something based on triples years ago, but I have not been able to find the reference to it. I would need to ask some of my colleagues to hunt it down. Here is one reference. If you are interested in pursuing this further, please let me know, and I will provide additional references. http://vmoc.museophile.com/pioneers/strachey.html Thanks, Terry Hardgrave terry.hardgrave@ed.gov terry.hardgrave@pearson.com
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:55:34 UTC