- From: Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz>
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:11:08 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Dan Brickley wrote:
> * Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> [2005-04-05 13:50-0400]
>
>>>http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/process.html#rec-modify
>
>
> FWIW I've added a link to that, and to www-rdf-comments, to the errata page,
> also noting that the WG has closed.
Dan,
Could you also add an additional note about a likely error in the RELAX
NG grammar (section A.1)? The literalPropertyElt production in this
grammar reads:
literalPropertyElt =
element * - ( local:* | rdf:RDF | rdf:ID | rdf:about | rdf:parseType |
rdf:resource | rdf:nodeID | rdf:datatype |
rdf:Description | rdf:aboutEach | rdf:aboutEachPrefix |
rdf:bagID | xml:* ) {
(idAttr | datatypeAttr )?, xmllang?, xmlbase?, text
}
This production only allows either an rdf:ID attribute or an
rdf:datatype attribute to be specified, but not both. This is different
from the normative grammar in chapter 7. The result of following this
grammar would be that triples with a datatyped literal as object cannot
be reified in the normal way.
The corrected production reads:
literalPropertyElt =
element * - ( local:* | rdf:RDF | rdf:ID | rdf:about | rdf:parseType |
rdf:resource | rdf:nodeID | rdf:datatype |
rdf:Description | rdf:aboutEach | rdf:aboutEachPrefix |
rdf:bagID | xml:* ) {
idAttr?, datatypeAttr?, xmllang?, xmlbase?, text
}
Any editors or former WG-members that can acknowledge this error too?
--
Arjohn
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 08:08:48 UTC